I reviewed 800+ pitch decks as a VC and trained an AI on the verdicts.
Have yours reviewed the same way.
You'll get the read a VC actually gives your deck: what's strong, what's missing, and how you look to an investor who Googles you first: the critique a partner would write, not the pitch you'd write.
The feedback a VC would never send you.
A partner forms a sharp opinion of your deck in minutes — then sends a two-line pass, if that. This is the part they keep to themselves: what's landing, what's missing, and how you look to someone who Googles you before they reply.
A sample of the feedback you get
- Sharp, specific problem — you name the customer and the pain in one line.
- Traction slide leads with real revenue, not vanity metrics.
- No competitive landscape — an investor will assume you haven't looked.
- Round size, terms, and cap table aren't stated.
- Go-to-market is a claim, not a plan.
- Both founders are easy to find on LinkedIn with relevant backgrounds.
- But the company has almost no web footprint and no press — expect investors to read the silence as early-stage risk.
Not a summary. Due diligence.
I'm not summarizing your startup — you already know your startup. I'm showing you the part you never get to see: what a VC quietly checks, what they don't buy, and the call they'd make before you're ever in the room.
A real excerpt from the memo format
The exact criteria you're being judged against
Real insider criteria — team credibility, competition, deck quality — from a year inside one of the world's most active accelerators.